Forms for various purposes under National Pension System for Central Government employees are available HERE.
AN AREA TO SHARE AND SPREAD NEWS EXCLUSIVELY RELATED TO NATIONAL PENSION SYSTEM (NPS)
Tuesday, 2 April 2013
Saturday, 30 March 2013
STAGE SET FOR A JOINT ACTION BY ALL C.G.EMPLOYEES DEMANDING WITHDRWAL OF PFRDA BILL
MOVEMENT
LAUNCHED BY THE CONFEDERATION CULMINATING IN A STRIKE ON 12.12.12 PAVES
WAY FOR A UNITED PLATFORM OF ALL C.G.EMPOLOYEES UNDER THE JOINT BANNER
OF ALL INDIA RAILWAYMEN FEDERATION - ALL INDIA DEFENCE EMPLOYEES
FEDERATION - & CONFEDERATION OF C.G.EMPLOYEES.
NATIONWIDE
DEMONSTRATIONS BY THE ENTIRETY OF C.G.EMPLOYEES ON 29th APRIL DEMANDING
CONSTITUTION OF 7th PAY COMMISSION IS CALLED UPON BY THE ABOVE
ORGANISATIONS.
JOINT
CALL ISSUED BY AIRF - AIDEF - CONFEDERATION IS PLACED IN OUR WEBSITE
FOR WIDEST CIRCULATION AMONG THE EMPLOYEES TO PREPARE THEM FOR A MASSIVE
DEMONSTRATION ON 29.04.2013.
Conf/26/2013 Dated: 24.3.2013
Dear Comrade,
We invite your attention to the efforts undertaken by us after the 12th December, one day strike action to bring about a united action by the Railway, Defence and other Central Government employees on certain pressing demands. In this connection you will recall that Com. S.K. Vyas,
our President had been writing and following it up with telephonic
conversations to bring about such a platform for action. We are happy to
inform you that the AIRF and AIDEF has now agreed to bring about a
joint platform of action to project two important demands of the CGEs.
Viz. the setting up of the 7th CPC and the withdrawal of the PFRDA Bill.
We
send herewith the joint Circular letter issued by the three
organizations on 23.3.2013 calling upon its units to organize a joint
demonstration on 29th April,
2013 in front of all offices throughout the country. The affiliates
and State Committees are requested to take initiative in organizing the programme
with maximum participation of members of the three organizations at a
mutually agreed Central place in all Cities/towns and other places. All
Units should be requested to send the telegram to the Prime Minister
and a report of the extent of participation sent to the Confederation
CHQ by 3rd May, 2013. We shall review the participation in the programme at our National Conference at Kolkata.
With greetings,
Yours fraternally,
K.K.N. Kutty
Secretary General.
COPY OF JOINT LETTER
ALL INDIA RAILWAYMEN FEDERATION
4, State Entry Road,New Delhi-110055.CONFEDERATION OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AND WORKERS.
Manishinath Bhawan. A2/95 Rajouri Gardn,
New Delhi. 110 027
ALL INDIA DEFENCE EMPLOYEES FEDERATION
S.M. Joshi Bhawan, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Road, Kirkee, PUNE. 3
23rd March.2013
Dear Comrades,
As you are aware, the Government in reply to a question raised in the Parliament has stated that setting up of the 7thCentral
Pay Commission for effecting wage revision of central Government
employees is not presently under its consideration. You will recall,
that a similar statement was made by the then Finance Minister, when
the demand for setting up the 6th CPC
was raised by the employees. The Joint movement of the Central
Government employees, for which we created the platform of the Steering
Committee of the organizations participating in the JCM under the
leadership of Late Com. J.P. Chaubey,
the then General Secretary of All India Railway men Federation could
ensure that the Government rescind its stand then and set up the 6th CPC. The real value of wages determined by the 6th CPC
has now been eroded to the extent of above 100% due to the
unprecedented inflation in the economy and spiraling rise in the prices
of essential commodities. While the Government permits wage negotiation
and revision in the fully owned Public Sector Undertakings every five
years, the denial to revise the wages of Central Government employees
despite such large scale erosion in the real value of wages is
absolutely unjustified.
The
Government had been persisting with the enactment of the PRFDA Bill in
the Parliament in almost all sessions ever since the UPA II Government
took over. Ironically they could elicit support from the main
Opposition Party in the country for this ill advised enactment. Lakhs
of new workers who have joined in various organizations of the
Government since2004 are worried of their future, which is forlorn and
bleak, in the wake of the denial of an age old social security scheme of
Pension. We have been together opposing this move right from the day,
the NDA Government introduced the bill in the Parliament in
2003. However, our efforts, actions and objections have all been
ignored with disdain by the Government. Though they could not muster
enough support required to pass the bill in the Parliament, the Union
Cabinet has recently taken the decision to allow 49% FDI in the pension
fund.
We
are to channelize our efforts through a wider platform of Unity.
Efforts are on anvil to bring about such a platform. In the meantime,
we have decided to call upon all Units and Branches of AiRF,
Confederation and AIDEF to organize Demonstration on 29th April, 2013. in front of all offices and send the following telegram to the Prime Minister.
WITHDRAW PFRDA BILL AND SET UP THE 7TH CPC
TO EFFECT WAGE REVISION OF CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.
With greetings,
Yours fraternally,
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
SHIVGOPAL MISRA KKN. KUTTY. C. SRiKUMAR.
General Secretary, AIRF Secretary General. Confederation. General Secretary.AIDEF.Friday, 15 March 2013
Retirement Age Enahanced in Kerala State
Govt. of Kerala enhanced retirement age of their employees, appointed on or after 01.04.2013, to 60 for introducing NPS to state employees.
Thursday, 14 March 2013
Comparison Between EPF and NPS returns
Returns on EPFO fund is difficult to compare with return on other Pension Schemes like New Pension Scheme.
With an important message, a written reply was submitted in Lok Sabha 4th March, 2013 by the Minister of State for Labour and Employment Shri. Kodikunnil Suresh about the returns on NPS as follows...
"The wage ceiling for mandatory provident fund contributions under the Employees’ Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 is Rs. 6,500/-.
Data of workers outside the wage limit is not maintained by the Employees’ Provident Fund Organization.
EPF money is invested as per the investment pattern of 2003 notified by Government of India which allows investment in Central Government Securities, State Government Securities, Bonds of Public Sector Undertakings and Private sectors. Returns on EPFO fund is difficult to compare with return on other Pension Schemes like New Pension Scheme.
The declaration of the return of NPS is on the basis of the accounting policy prescribed by NPS which allow the NAV to be declared on the basis of current market value of the investments. While EPFO follows the cost value of the investment for accounting its investment and return is declared on the basis of actual receipt of interest on the investments.
The return on EPFO investments are fixed whereas the return on NPS are not fixed and fluctuates on daily basis depending on the prevailing market conditions".
With an important message, a written reply was submitted in Lok Sabha 4th March, 2013 by the Minister of State for Labour and Employment Shri. Kodikunnil Suresh about the returns on NPS as follows...
"The wage ceiling for mandatory provident fund contributions under the Employees’ Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 is Rs. 6,500/-.
Data of workers outside the wage limit is not maintained by the Employees’ Provident Fund Organization.
EPF money is invested as per the investment pattern of 2003 notified by Government of India which allows investment in Central Government Securities, State Government Securities, Bonds of Public Sector Undertakings and Private sectors. Returns on EPFO fund is difficult to compare with return on other Pension Schemes like New Pension Scheme.
The declaration of the return of NPS is on the basis of the accounting policy prescribed by NPS which allow the NAV to be declared on the basis of current market value of the investments. While EPFO follows the cost value of the investment for accounting its investment and return is declared on the basis of actual receipt of interest on the investments.
The return on EPFO investments are fixed whereas the return on NPS are not fixed and fluctuates on daily basis depending on the prevailing market conditions".
Tuesday, 12 March 2013
PFRDA Circular Update
PFRDA issued circular on replacing the existing facility on Phased Withdrawal with Deferred Withdrawal. Click HERE to see the full circular.
Thursday, 7 March 2013
Status of National Pension System March - 2013
Status of National Pension System as on March 2013 is given here. Please go through this.
Friday, 1 March 2013
Rollout of New Pension Scheme in SBI challenged
The High Court of Kerala has admitted a writ petition filed by State
Banks’ Staff Union (Kerala) to quash implementation of the New Pension
Scheme (NPS) in State Bank of India.
The writ also prayed for directions to revert those recruited on or after August 1, 2010, back to existing pension scheme.
HEARING POSTED
Justice P. N. Ravindran has posted the case for further hearing after a month.
The interim order directed that amounts contributed by employees towards
the pension fund be kept in a separate account and maintained with the
trustee bank.
The case was filed by A. Jayakumar, General Secretary of State Banks’ Staff Union, Kerala Circle.
The petitioner recalled that NPS was implemented as part of the industry-level 9{+t}{+h} bipartite wage settlement.
As per this, Defined Contribution Pension Scheme (DCPS)/NPS would apply to those joining services on or after April 1, 2010.
But this settlement between Indian Banks’ Association and unions of
other banks would not apply to SBI, the petitioner contended. This is
because the bank was not party to this settlement insofar as
pension-related matters were concerned.
But central board of SBI on November 8, 2010, decided that all employees
joining in permanent scale on or after August 1, 2010, shall be offered
only the benefit of DCPS.
The SBI Act did not empower the central board to amend pension fund
rules, and that too with retrospective effect, it was contended.
PARLIAMENT NOD
The SBI Act also makes it clear that any regulation framed in this manner will have to be laid before Parliament.
It will take effect in the existing or modified form as decided by both the Houses of Parliament only.
In the present case, the central board has taken a unilateral decision to modify the pension scheme.
Legal recourse was also being sought on grounds that the pension scheme once framed cannot be modified without issuing notice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)